iParticipate 13
1. Do you think the government should have more or
less power to exercise prior restraint (censorship)?
I don’t think the government
needs any more power than it already does to exercise prior restraint upon its
citizens. Freedom of speech is a pivotal aspect of our democracy and one that I
value very highly. I should be able to look up a variety of opinions from
around the United States without having to worry about being withheld from certain
points of view. Thankfully, this does not seem too much of an issue today and I
certainly hope it doesn’t become one in the future.
2. How would
your decision in question one affect national security interests?
Freedom of Speech is in
the very first amendment of our country’s constitution. I hold onto my beliefs
and morals very strongly and I don’t think a cease of increased power on prior
restraint would affect national security in a serious manner. It may affect the
interests of homeland security or any politicians who seek to influence national
security but that does not mean the United States government needs to place
bars on one of our most sacred freedoms.
3. What type of
restrictions should be placed on the advertising of alcohol?
No more than there
already are. I’ve seen plenty of alcohol ads that end with the
narrator/spokesperson telling the audience to drink responsibly. Alcohol commercials
don’t feature high schoolers partying with bud lights their hands but usually show
a group of friends in their twenties hanging out a bar or a ball game and
having an enjoyable time which is an adequate way of advertising alcohol.
4. If you were
in charge, would you place restrictions on social media posts?
Yes, I would. Hate speech
isn’t illegal in our country and nor would I make it so; I’m a very strong
supporter of freedom of speech even if I don’t agree with it. However, I would place harsher restrictions
on the spreading of speech that is enticing violent or unlawful acts such as hate
crimes or vandalizing in the name of a protest. Anytime a post or tweet that incites
violence is caught then severe consequences will be enforced with the help of
proper authorities.
5. What is your opinion of the television and movie
rating systems in terms of effectiveness and protecting children? How would you improve the system?
I think anyone under the
age of seventeen should not be allowed to see a rated R film in movie theatres
even if they are accompanied by a parent. Too many parents allow their children
to see movies with them that are inappropriate. I remember attending a screening
of the rated R film, “Deadpool”, and seeing a Mother and her two children who
had to be no older than twelve sitting in the row in front of me. I find it
utterly ridiculous that a parent could think it’s okay for their child to see a
film like “Deadpool” or any rated R film. They’re rated R for a reason and
having kids see these movies in theatres is not a part of the plan.
Comments
Post a Comment